Court: Arizona DCS Errors and Lies Caused a Father to Lose Rights to his Child
Health Impact News
Sloppy work, lack of evidence and outright lies caused a father to lose parental rights to his daughter, the Court of Appeals argued in an opinion that criticizes the work of nearly everyone involved in the four-year-long case.
The Department of Child Safety, not the father, is to blame for circumstances that led to a juvenile-court decision last year to sever the father’s parental rights, the appeals court wrote.
“(A)ny perceived lack of a bond between Melody and Father was not because of Father’s lack of effort, but because of DCS’s delay, contact restrictions and substantial failure to try to unify Melody with Father,” the three-judge panel wrote.
The unanimous opinion overturned the July 2018 decision and sent the case back to juvenile court.
Parent attorneys hailed the opinion as a much-needed blow for accountability in a system that often is cloaked in privacy.
Judge Paul J. McMurdie dissected the case that started in January 2015, when the father contacted DCS after learning a woman with whom he had had a brief relationship had given birth to a child in Arizona. Donald heard the child had been promptly taken into DCS custody. He offered to take a paternity test, as he rightly suspected he was the father.
From there, everything went downhill, according to the appeals court’s account. DCS added the father to the case that put the child in DCS custody, writing that he was unable to parent the child due to neglect, an inability to care for her basic needs, and abandonment. The juvenile court accepted DCS’ filing and directed the child to be placed in foster care.
But, McMurdie wrote, DCS’ allegations of neglect and abandonment were done “without any investigation,” and were not backed up by any facts. He called the allegations “generic assertions” that started a long process that denied the father the ability to establish a bond with his child.
“The record is devoid of any evidence supporting the unfitness allegations in the petition, a fact DCS acknowledged at oral argument before this (appeals) court,” McMurdie wrote.
Read the full article at The Arizona Republic.