Vaccines and the questionable obligation of States to pay exorbitant amounts

Imagine living in a city where the mayor decides what to buy. The first citizen has decided that we must change houses. He also chooses her beautiful, in a skyscraper.

Housing is expensive. We live next to a poor country, at war. There are many displaced people, many of whom we know. We decide to host them. Many of us help our neighbors devastated by conflict and famine. So we end up with less money to spend. We call the mayor and thank him for the house he chose for us, but we do not need it and then we have no more savings. He gets imputed. He says we’re obliged to buy it. Because since he administers our city, these are the rules. He decided it and stop.

How could we elect such an administrator? But then when did we do it?

Conclusion: the real estate developer takes it out on us and sues us. He wants the money from the house even though the mayor signed the contract for us, forcing us to accept it. But even the first citizen takes us to court, because he decided to decide everything he and we shut up and pay.

We replace the parties: the obliged citizens are the Poles. The administrator who decides the purchases is the EU and the real estate developer Pf

Read.

According to the Polish media Dziennik Gazeta Pra Pr, Pfizer filed a civil lawsuit last week in Bruell

The Polish authorities justified themselves by recalling the enormous financial burden that the country has suffered due to the influx of refugees fleeing the war in Ukraine. Poland has taken in more Ukrainian refugees than any other European country in the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

Last year, Poland had asked for a contract change with Pfizer for 60 million doses citing the expected “force majeure” clause. In short, for Warsaw, the economic effect of the neighboring conflict, combined with the change in the epidemiological situation would justify a reworking of the contract.

But nothing to do, despite the declared availability, Pfizer has no intention of accepting the clause, the rules dictate who makes the biggest voice. A Pfizer spokesman said that ” Pfizer and BioNTech are trying to force Poland to respect its commitments”.

“Poland cannot directly terminate the contract for the supply of vaccines, since the contracting parties are the European Commission and the producers“said Pfizer.

On December 6 there will be the first court hearing.

Poland is not alone in this situation. Polish Health Minister Katarz So He noted that other EU member states will face similar lawsuits.

Courage, then, the famous judge in Berlin could wake up.

And in Italy?

Given that the expense “purchase vaccines in abundance “continues to be honored (advances and increases included) despite the fact that we also have to think about the ranks of poor people who swell every day, all the rest of Health,” after the pandemic”, pulls the belt more and more. Here the trend.

What will the Meloni government do? Did anyone ask?

Original source: https://blog.ilgiornale.it/locati/2023/11/30/i-vaccini-e-il-discutibile-obbligo-degli-stati-di-pagarne-quantita-esorbitanti/