The meaning of the Nobel Prizes on vaccines

After the awarding of the Nobel Prize to the two scientists who collaborated to perfect the mRNA vaccines, Dreeissman e Katalin Karikó, here is bouncing from site to site the study on the technique to mRNA that pubblicò Still life in 2018. Three years before the most extensive vaccination campaign on the Western population.

The credit for dusting off W Robert Kogon (pseudonym of the German investigative journalist we have already talked about).

It’s called “A new era in vaccinology” and you find it here.

The text collects a lot of research on mRNA products, explains why the technique is to be considered promising, for example because “equipped with high power, rapid development capability and low cost manufacturing potential and safe administration”.

Scrolling through the work you get to the Safet capitolo chapter, dedicated to security. That, yes let’s say now in hindsight, he could / should have warned those who spread the informed consents, in addition to all the government institutions that have promoted the vaccine from.

It reads:

“Potential safety issues that could be evaluated in future preclinical and clinical studies include local and systemic inflammation, biodistribution and persistence of expressed immunogen, stimulation of autoreactive antibodies, and potential toxic effects…”

Then:

“One possible concern could be that some mRNA vaccines induce potent responses to type I interferon, which have been associated not only with inflammation but potentially with autoimmunity as well.

Therefore, the identification of individuals at increased risk of autoimmune reactions prior to mRNA vaccination may allow reasonable precautions to be taken”.

The authors continue by quoting “studies that have shown that RNA andac“and they conclude with the warning:

“Security will therefore require a continuous evaluation since different modes and systems of mRNA administration are used for the first time in humans and are being tested in larger patient populations”.

Oibo. It was 2018. In 2021, vaccines were distributed to the entire Western population, and no health authority has warned of such risks.

Repeat: the researchers stated that reasonable precautions should be taken before administering a product to mRNA on subjects at increased risk of autoimmune reactions. And who are these but the frail? Diabetics, patients with all forms of sclerosis, who suffer from lupus, Crohn’s disease or autism?

We wonder if those who are familiar with the same diseases, from diabetes 1 to the forms of
sclerosis. We also wonder how the immune system of a pregnant woman should be considered. Who’s doing cancer treatments?

Not only that. The authors already emphasized the possibility “treatment of pathological thrombus formation”. And what did ai say  their patients doctors who treat thrombosis, bleeding diseases, heart disease? To be careful? Or to vaccinate without fear?

In 2023, the Nobel Prize was awarded to the two scientists. It must be said, for the record, that Pfizer is one of the main “donors” to the Karolinska Institute, the Nobel prize-awarding institute.

Ask:

What is the significance of this award given to the two scientists?

Good because the general attention a little superficial will focus only on the ending of the story?

Why did you clear your mRNA drugs?

Why will the prize put an end to the controversy? And what were the controversies that deserved discussion and attention?

Good because now that you have the Nobel – is the message / wish implied – you will no longer think of highlighting adverse events?

For sure good, good twice, because you had put it in writing and we fools have trusted the words of the quaquaraqua. 

Original source: https://blog.ilgiornale.it/locati/2023/10/08/il-senso-dei-nobel-sui-vaccini/