“I, doctor, damaged by the vaccine, today I ask for truth”

Carlo is 57 years old, he has been an orthopedist for almost thirty. He works in a large hospital in northern Italy (we also omit the city). What they say a life on the ward. Divided between the operating room, patient visits and, when Covid arrived, the first line with all colleagues. “As in the middle of a flood we did not waste time and we set out to do. None of us thought to back down, self-denial is part of our profession”.

The details of that emergency have been illustrated to us, by thread and by sign. But what happened ‘after’, to Carlo, and to many like him, it is still difficult to talk about.

“We were among the first to receive the COVID vaccine. There was no time to ask too many questions, it seemed the only viable way to get out of the pandemic as soon as possible and to ‘protect’ our patients. I received the second dose in February (2021) and, after 4 days, I had a form of very high arterial hypertension resulting in cerebral hemorrhage and neurological damage. A severe pathology: I was in intensive care for a month, I lost my speech and memory, for about six months even the sight from one eye”.

Did he suffer from any illness? 

“I have always been healthy as a fish, every six months I did all the exams in the hospital in addition to those for a competitive fitness assessment the previous month, never a hint of hypertension or similar disorders…”.

Who had a suspicion that mRNA vaccination was involved in stroke?

“Even today – and this is a paradox-some colleagues affirm that there is no evidence that a link exists, but, at the same time, they admit that, precisely because there is no data, it cannot be excluded”.

Almost two years have passed and several studies have been published in this regard: excess myocarditis and bleeding after mRNA vaccinations have been observed (to name only the adverse events recognized as possible by Ema and included in liars).

“Of course, but no one clarifies or takes responsibility for signing it in individual cases. With these vaccines-although of new generation and their first large-scale use – no compilations have been made observation cards as with all new drugs. Adverse events have never been collected, so each doctor is in a certain sense entitled to say that it is not known whether these pathologies are related or not”.

However, she was released from the third dose.

“Only temporarily after visits to Occupational Medicine. I resumed working in the hospital at the end of 2021. In the clinic I had to re-train my mental endurance and reveal the tasks at the computer, I felt slowed down even to use the keyboard. I must say that getting back into the lane helped me a lot. I started seeing patients again as before. Then in February (2022) I fell ill with Covid, in light form, and after two weeks, I recovered in the hospital”.

What is a temporary exemption? 

“The definitive exemption is up to a commission but, by law, pathology specialists must participate in it. I am still waiting for a primary neurologist to speak on my case.”

In the meantime (just yesterday) the new government has removed the vaccination obligation.

“Yes, thank goodness. However, I would like to highlight another paradox. If the obligation had remained in force and I had been exempted from recalls for health reasons, I would not have been able to be a doctor anymore: I would have been forbidden to visit patients and operate on them. Then I would have been not only salaried and null but – the first case in history-prevented by decree to carry out a job because I am sick, although the disease does not prevent me from exercising”.

All because it was believed, – science believed-that an unvaccinated person was more contagious than a vaccinated person.

“Exactly. It was a belief (false) in force until the day before yesterday that everyone pretended to believe…”

How many of your colleagues have you seen harmed by these vaccines?

“So many people, among colleagues and friends. Not only heart attacks and strokes, also excruciating pain in the bones, skin breakouts and severe headaches”.

All diseases passed in silence?

“Yes, it is said that you can not know whether these effects depend on vaccinations, nor if they do not depend. However to date, there are more studies that have highlighted the occurrence of side effects in some vaccinated subjects than regarding the effectiveness of vaccines: we know that there is no certainty that the vaccinated are free from getting sick and transmitting the virus”.

But since there is this doubt, after two years, would it not be more convenient (even economically ) to apply the precautionary principle: until clarity is made, we abstain?

“Of course yes, but if you were to collect the data now there would be all the compensation to be paid…”.

Thanks for the interview, Carlo. Who knows what Giovanni Floris e Fabio Fazio who ask to know if the doctor who treats them “believes in science”they also wish to deepen.

Original source: https://blog.ilgiornale.it/locati/2022/11/01/io-medico-danneggiato-dal-vaccino-oggi-chiedo-verita/