Is the Court for obligation, then ?
It was a pronunciation policy that of the Constitutional Court arrived yesterday after a long wait. On the questions posed by the various courts regarding the constitutional legitimacy of the imposition of vaccinations could be discussed as much and in depth as they have been doing for days.
The verdict does not surprise us. We were already prepared for an overflowing and empty politics. The pretense of slipping into each other’s lives with their fingers raised to tell us what is right and what is wrong. And trouble otherwise.
And what about of that sense of responsibility that should invest those who play a role for the community? Simulacrum. That’s why we were prepared for yesterday’s pronunciation. Pronunciation arrived in the form of a laced statement (we will read the reasons later).
Prerequisite
Remember the little girl hospitalized for a tetanus that was not tetanus and the attempt to take away the parental authority? It was all more a clamor of news than of substance, the story resolved well, in silence, but the noise served to create the suitable ground for the law on vaccination obligation in childhood.
You will also remember the little ones with leukemia who died of measles and always the politics ready to blame the “blame” on the little brothers “dangerous does not go va The charges were not substantiated in a court but shouted in the press, a terrible example of looting and the destruction of feelings. There was no contagion from the brothers. An apology ? Not received.
You can go back even further. The Bunting case or the Bella affair. With politics to warn us. “that the children are not ours but of the State” and that, if you do not manage the disease, there is always the accompaniment (to death)”.
We were prepared.
Yet in Greece the High Court has made an opposing ruling, the vaccination obligation for health workers is unconstitutional – points out a reader-and it happened a few hours before that from us.
It is understood that the Greek people have suffered the most, often the path of pain is an obligatory path.
Aut aut. Accept or object
So what to do?
At the next emergency we will be at the same point, forced to accept a string of bites to be able to work or study. Is it really so?
You can always practice conscientious objection: as one once did for military service: either one made himself useful to society or one learned to handle weapons. Or as doctors who choose not to perform abortions do today, or as those who refuse blood transfusions or, again, Muslims who do not consume pork and see the right recognized in public canteens. It says no. They are dictated by conscientious objection, supported also by laws and judgments.
It is also true that those who refuse vaccines today why does he fear the consequences on his own health or because he does not want to protect himself with a drug grown on fetal cells he has more difficult life than a Muslim who rejects ham, it is the climate dictated by our historical moment (you can change sex or have an abortion as a child but if you don’t want to get vaccinated you will pay for it…)
You don’t they find more public institutions willing to respect basic law. Years ago we could abstain from the so-called compulsory childhood vaccinations through a process, called conscientious objection, proposed by the Comilva. The State and ASL took note of the choice and the children were still welcomed in kindergartens and schools. Today, not only is the right to education banned, but families who make such a choice are being bullied and persecuted.
Those who object have a difficult life having to deal with the education of their children, often also have to digest the remorse of giving up a team sport. He must be ready to retire from work, possibly even prepare for appeals in the courts, ergo: to say this no one must be rich or at least well-off.
But it can be done. There is never a single alternative.
PS. important, the objection applies only to those who have a conscience.
Original source: https://blog.ilgiornale.it/locati/2022/12/02/la-corte-e-per-lobbligo-dunque/
