If there is no alternative there is check

The case of the Triestine cardiopath to whom the hospital has been discussed for a long time Cattinara he would have denied heart surgery because he refused to get vaccinated. Four vaccinations required and not made: against pneumococcus, Covid, influenza and Herpes Zoster.

A lot has already been written, so we will not dwell on it, but we invite some reflection.

It must be said that in the aftermath of the publication of the hospital letter by the newspaper truth – in which it was read that the patient was not operated because he did not have the recommended vaccinations – the hospital tried to fix the incident. Not being able to deny having sent the email in which it was also specified that the patient would be deleted from the waiting lists, the structure explained that it was the heart patient himself who refused the intervention and specified “that he always followed the patient regularly”.

Read here.

A case to clarify 

It was later learned that the congresswoman Alice Buonguerrieri, parent company of FdI to the commission of inquiry on COVID, presented a question to ask for clarification on the matter and solicit an intervention from the minister Schillaci.

Buonguerrieri wishes to ascertain whether there has been “discrimination of a fragile patient, a serious fact, contrary to Article 32 of the Constitution” and asks the Minister how patients can be protected in the future.

Hypocrisy on the immune system

Since the pandemic is over and since there are no laws that oblige those who are next to operate on the 4 contested vaccinations, we report here some considerations collected over the years (not only from the columns of this blog). And, given the relevance, we ask parliamentarians and the minister to take this into account.

What do you get sick most frequently in the hospital, especially if you are elderly, immunodepressed and undergoing surgery? Of various bacterial infections: staphylococci (at least 30 types), pseudomonas (the three species that prefer humans), various pneumococcal pneumonia since the vaccine covers only 9 strains but there are at least 90 in circulation, countless bacteria also opportunistic (ie those that when we are healthy live in balance with us) and others conveyed by catheters and ducts that come into contact with the internal organs.

What to do to prevent these outbreaks of hospital infections? It would not seem sensible to vaccinate those who are planning an intervention: first because up to 15/21 days after vaccination no antibodies are produced against the disease for which you are vaccinated and then because you are immunodepressed of by default for the same period of time. It is a physiological immunosuppression due precisely to vaccinations.

To the questions to be submitted to the minister we also add this: why in Italy is reserved so much insistence on the application of ” various vaccination protocols” etra, for the elderly, immunosuppressed and frail categories well aware that these practices close to hospitalization could make the sick even more fragile and do not solve the plague of hospital infections at all?

The mystification

Some media have reported the news of the Triestine patient putting the news in the background, namely that that a sick person has been discriminated against and deprived of an intervention fundamental to their health because they have refused health treatment (legitimate, indeed, according to informed consent, due). On the contrary, the suspension of the primary who signed the email was emphasized, “because of the insults of the no va va Yes, from what we learn, the doctor would not have been self-excused for affixing that signature  – as a sign of apology or repentance-but because harshly criticized by unnamed rude, no goes va

A vademecum and pay attention

As for us, given the historical moment disputed by increasingly heated ideological positions, here is the our new year’s handbook to … not take cantonate, perhaps because you are distracted by a thousand things or dazzled by mystifications.

The vademecum is summarized as follows: if there is no alternative then it means that the purpose is control (of the population).

It increases technology, made up of useful and innovative means. Will we find ourselves with virtual money and ATM cards? It’s okay as long as the cash remains, otherwise who protects us from clicks empties accounts?

Will a digital identity be good for everything? For the above reasons it must be accepted only if the material alternatives resist.

They increase vaccines for every present and future disease. Good thing as long as you are free to choose if and when to do them, at any age and in any health condition. The non-alternative we saw during Covid, is it okay for it to be repeated?

Let’s ask ourselves, who among us would agree to buy a house with only the elevator and no stairs?

Finally, but not least:

A all of you and new readers my best wishes for a happy new year.

Original source: https://blog.ilgiornale.it/locati/2025/01/05/se-non-ce-alternativa-ce-controllo/