Vaccines to children, why some doctors are seriously concerned

”Why would you want to vaccinate young children against Covid?”

The 76 doctors of the United Kingdom who sent a letter to the health authorities giving reasons for not doing so.

”Why do you want, if every new variant of SARS Cov 2 is less and less virulent and if there is different evidence of the poor effectiveness of these vaccines? What if concerns about long-term effects increase? Why do you insist, if the vast majority of the little ones you want to vaccinate have already come into contact with the virus?”

The 76 doctors remind the authorities that the company Pfizer he submitted a lack of documentation to the FDA. For example, “there was no statistically significant difference between the placebo and vaccinated groups neither among participants aged 6-23 months nor in children aged 2-4 years even after the third dose. Surprisingly i results were based on only three participants in the younger age group (1 vaccinated and 2 placebo) and only seven participants in children aged 2 to 4 years (2 vaccinated and 5 placebo).

The same manufacturer Pfizer said that the numbers are too low to draw safe conclusions.

Why do you want to vaccinate children?

Over the entire period from the first dose onwards (see Page 39 tables 19 and 20), there were a total of 225 infected children in the vaccinated arm and 150 in the placebo arm, with a calculated vaccine efficacy of only 25% (14% for 6-23 months and 33% for 2-4 months).

When we talk about security, the data are even more scarce: only 1057 children, some not double-blind, were followed for only 2 months”. That is, the family members of the children and the examiners knew who was vaccinated and who was not and this, as the epidemiologist explained to us Stefano Petti, “it compromises the objectivity of the trial because those who are in favor of the vaccine tend to belittle adverse events and those who are, on the other hand, are against it, could exaggerate its scope”. Nothing to do with the scientific method.

“Why did the FDA consider this to be sufficient evidence to vaccinate children? “The doctors continue.

“Interestingly, Sweden and Norway do not recommend the vaccine for 5-11 year olds, and the Netherlands does not recommend it for children who have already had Covid-19. The director of the Danish Health and Medicines Authority said recently that, as far as is now known, the decision to vaccinate children was a mistake. Belgium suspended vaccinations in January Modern under the age of 31 because myocarditis were more frequent than the benefits of injections”. Here.

We add, news of the last hours, that the Uruguay sospeso has suspended vaccinations to under 13s after a judge asked the government to publish contracts with Pfizer. (It seems that, despite the ruling, Pfizer does not want to make them public).

The authors specify:

• “Throughout 2020 and 2021, not a single child between 1 and 9 years old died when Covid-19 was the only diagnosis on the death certificate, according to WHO data.
• A detailed study in England from March 1, 2020 to March 1, 2021 found that only 6 children under the age of 18 died without comorbidities. There were no deaths between the ages of 1 and 4 years.
• Children eliminate the virus more easily than adults.
• Children develop effective, robust and sustained immune responses.
• Since the arrival of the Omicron variant, infections have generally been much milder. This also applies to unvaccinated people under 5 years old.
• By June 2022 it is estimated that 89% of children aged 1-4 years had already had SARS-CoV-2 infection.
• Recent data from Israel show excellent long-lasting immunity after infection in children, especially between the ages of 5 and 11.

• In adults it has become apparent that the effectiveness of the vaccine steadily decreases over time, necessitating recalls at regular intervals. In particular, the effectiveness of the vaccine declined more rapidly against the latest variants of Omicron”. 

Concern about adverse events

On adverse events the doctors write “ ” Although post-vaccination myocarditis appears to be less common in children aged 5 to 11 years than in older children, it has nevertheless increased. Cardiac resonances on adolescents with pericarditis, up to 7 months from onset, they show that it is anything but mild disease”.

The authors inform that “Pfitzer is required, by post-authorization conditions for age 5-11 years, to inform about myocarditis risk. In particular, the company is expected to conduct studies on myocarditis but the results will be made public no earlier than 2027”.

Professionals admit that they are concerned about the effects of the vaccine on the immune system.

”There is evidence of vaccine-induced disruption of both innate and adaptive immune responses”. Here.

Doctors also express concern about the functionality of the reproductive system, given that, “after vaccination, reductions in the number of mobile spermatozoa have emerged”.

They also declare:  “The complete omission of information explaining to the public the different and new technology used in Covid-19 vaccines compared to standard vaccines, and the failure to communicate the lack of long-term safety data, borders on misinformation”.

The decline in credibility of institutions

According to the 76 doctors in the UK, the introduction of the New unnecessary gene-based vaccines on young children risks seriously undermining parents ‘ confidence in the entire immunisation programme. ”The poor quality of the data presented by Pfizer risks discrediting the pharmaceutical industry and, together, the regulators who authorized the product.

Advertising vaccines to children is unethical and violates informed consent

In the UK (but also in Italy) it is forbidden to advertise prescription drugs. There is no regulation on vaccines, however, every advertising campaign has precise rules. Children under 16 must not be recipients of messages they cannot understand. But in the UK they circulate cartoon posters which show vaccinated superheroes.

The 76 British doctors reflect on manipulative messages: the commercials make children believe that those who do not vaccinate are not a superhero.

For doctors, superhero advertising violates the rules on advertising aimed at Children and undermines informed consent.

Original source: https://blog.ilgiornale.it/locati/2022/07/09/vaccini-ai-bambini-perche-alcuni-medici-sono-seriamente-preoccupati/