NO MORE CASTLE DOCTRINE IN TEXAS? HB196 OPPOSE THIS BILL

https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/PE/htm/PE.9.htm#9.32
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/house-bill-196-castle-doctrine/

MERCH AND SOCIAL MEDIA:
https://linktr.ee/Renomay

MAILBOX:
Reno May
2665 Santa Rosa Ave #211
Santa Rosa, CA 95407

Support the channel:
https://www.subscribestar.com/reno-may

MY CAMERA GEAR:
https://www.amazon.com/shop/renomay?listId=2MFILYCSRTSW4&ref=idea_share_inf

DISCLAIMER!!!!
LINKS FOUND MAY BE AFFILIATE LINKS!
THERE ARE NO GUN SALES OCCURRING IN THIS VIDEO!

THIS QUOTE AINT LEGIT:
In Texas, State Representative Terry Meza (D-Irving) has introduced HB196. Her bill would repeal the state’s "castle doctrine." This doctrine allows a homeowner to use deadly force against an armed intruder who breaks into his home.
SHE SAID:
"I’m not saying that stealing is okay," Meza explained. "All I’m saying is that it doesn’t warrant a death penalty. Thieves only carry weapons for self-protection and to provide the householder an incentive to cooperate. They just want to get their loot and get away. When the resident tries to resist is when people get hurt. If only one side is armed fewer people will be killed."
Under the new law the homeowner’s obligation is to flee the home at the first sign of intrusion. If fleeing is not possible he must cooperate with the intruder. But if violence breaks out it is the homeowner’s responsibility to make sure no one gets hurt. The best way to achieve this is to use the minimum non-lethal force possible because intruders will be able to sue for any injuries they receive at the hands of the homeowner."
"In most instances the thief needs the money more than the homeowner does," Meza reasoned. "The homeowner’s insurance we reimburse his losses. On balance, the transfer of property is likely to lead to a more equitable distribution of wealth. If my bill can help make this transfer a peaceful one so much the better."